The Paris Agreement was a landmark for humankind. In this timely and important book, two of the principal creators of that agreement show us why and how we can now realize its promise. I hope it is widely read and acted on.”—Jane Goodall

The authors did a an amazing job outlining the two worlds we would end up with if we don't take drastic actions to achieve net zero emission by 2050: one with frequent/intense natural disasters with hot and polluted air (think Beijing air) or one with plenty of green space, shared vehicles, rapid trains for traveling to substain the projected population growth to 10ish billions. If I understand what you want to say here correctly, 'I can see you tomorrow if they don't cancel the class' is the correct form.

Our team brings a wide range of experiences and skills to the work of co-creating a regenerative future.

Cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50% before 2030. Cut them to nothing by 2050. These are impressive goals that the authors of this book say are necessary to reach Paris agreement goals of limiting any further global warming to 1.5 degree centigrade worldwide. How do we get there? Not much detail in this short book about that. Q3. It is mentioned in some resources that when simply giving information of asking for information we use will

Q4. Is the following example an expression of prediction based on opinion or knowledge (to use will) or based on evidence or decision or intention (to use be going to)? ok I'm in a weird headspace for this one because I read the first half weeks ago when I was feeling all-too-sanguine coronavirus and then finished it this week when I am feeling MUCH LESS SO but I'm gonna go with a resounding ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh This book recommends ten climate actions that move us away from fossil fuels and towards a fairer economic system.Regarding 1, the 'going to' form reflects the fact there is a plan and so is appropriate. The 'will' form can also work as a future fact, and it would also make sense since it follows on from 'will' in the previous sentence. I'm not sure which of these two I'd use, but probably 'will', though really either is fine. The Future We Choose, a new book by the architects of the Paris climate accords, offers two contrasting visions for how the world might look in thirty years (read the best case scenario here) In both cases, it comes naturally to me to use the form "be going to"; is it so grammatically incorrect? I found the final third of the book (about solutions, both at the systemic and individual level) to be far lighter though, in terms of substance. The book could have gone anywhere after the first two-thirds, instead the ending wasn't fitting and it read like things wrapped up before it delved into anything of significance. Q1. Is the following example an expression of prediction based on opinion (to use will) or based on evidence (to use be going to)?

If they are going to be there only to be obstructors, and only to put spanners into the system, they should not be there,” said Christiana Figueres, who was pivotal to the delivery of the landmark Paris climate agreement in 2015. Humanities & Social Sciences > Student Success and Career Development > Student Success > First-Year ExperienceSequential Crises across the world Join thousands of others in taking up membership of the Earth.Org Movement.