Pepys, Samuel; Latham, Robert; Matthews, William (2001). The Diary of Samuel Pepys: A New and Complete Transcription, Volume 10 (Footnote on Will Hewer). University of California Press. p.182. ISBN 9780520227156 . Retrieved 17 September 2015. Ollard, Richard (1984) [1974]. Pepys: a biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-281466-4. This was the world of Samuel Pepys, Clerk of the Acts to the Navy Board and diarist. He had grown up in the city and, with a talent for administration and hard work, was a rising star in the English Admiralty of King Charles II. The diary he kept for nearly ten years from 1660 eventually became one of Britain's most celebrated and a unique records of everyday life for an upper middle-class person in Stuart England. Historians have long admired Pepys' diary because it features many minor day-to-day happenings that other contemporary documents do not cover.

Sam Faiers welcomed baby Edward standing up in family - Metro Sam Faiers welcomed baby Edward standing up in family - Metro

In 1650, he went to the University of Cambridge, having received two exhibitions from St Paul's School (perhaps owing to the influence of George Downing, who was chairman of the judges and for whom he later worked at the Exchequer) [12] and a grant from the Mercers' Company. [ citation needed] In October, he was admitted as a sizar to Magdalene College; he moved there in March 1651 and took his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1654. [8] [13] Blessed be God, at the end of the last year I was in very good health, without any sense of my old pain but upon taking of cold.From 1685 to 1688, he was active not only as Secretary of the Admiralty, but also as MP for Harwich. He had been elected MP for Sandwich, but this election was contested and he immediately withdrew to Harwich. When James fled the country at the end of 1688, Pepys's career also came to an end. In January 1689, he was defeated in the parliamentary election at Harwich; in February, one week after the accession of William III and Mary II, he resigned his secretaryship. The purpose of this lesson is to explore some extracts from the will of Samuel Pepys made in 1701 and later added to in 1703. You may have already ‘met’ Samuel Pepys whilst finding out about the Great Fire of London in 1666 and read his descriptions of the fire i n his famous diary. Dined at home, and after dinner to Westminster Hall, where I met with Billing the quaker at Mrs. Michell’s shop, who is still of the former opinion he was of against the clergymen of all sorts, and a cunning fellow I find him to be. Home, and there I had news that Sir W. Pen is resolved to ride to Sir W. Batten’s country house to-morrow, and would have me go with him, so I sat up late, getting together my things to ride in, and was fain to cut an old pair of boots to make leathers for those I was to wear. Outbreaks of plague were not unusual events in London; major epidemics had occurred in 1592, 1603, 1625 and 1636. [29] Furthermore, Pepys was not among the group of people who were most at risk. He did not live in cramped housing, he did not routinely mix with the poor, and he was not required to keep his family in London in the event of a crisis. [30] It was not until June 1665 that the unusual seriousness of the plague became apparent, so Pepys' activities in the first five months of 1665 were not significantly affected by it. [30] Claire Tomalin wrote that 1665 was, to Pepys, one of the happiest years of his life. He worked very hard that year, and the outcome was that he quadrupled his fortune. [30] In his annual summary on 31 December, he wrote, "I have never lived so merrily (besides that I never got so much) as I have done this plague time". [31] The red wax is a personal seal of Samuel Pepys, probably created by melting sealing wax and impressing it with his signet ring. It was another way of confirming his identity, reinforcing his signature. Pepys lived to a good age (70) for the period. He was born on 23 February 1633 and died on 26 May 1703 and it is likely that his handwriting worsened in the period before his death as he became more physically frail.

Sam Faiers welcomes third baby with Paul Knightley - Metro Sam Faiers welcomes third baby with Paul Knightley - Metro

The main text of his final will was written by somebody else, probably a clerk working for Pepys or for his legal advisers. The opening phrase is clearer and larger as it is the first phrase in the document and because it is a prayer to God. The clerk has left spaces in the document for Pepys to insert his name and position , the name s of the people to whom he left his land and property, and various sums of money. The remaining blank space s ha ve been filled with dashe s to prevent anybody adding any extra names or amounts.Matthew, H. C. G.; Harrison, B.; Goldman, L., eds. (23 September 2004). "Pepys's servants". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (onlineed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/ref:odnb/93850 . Retrieved 9 August 2023. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.) In 1667, with the war lost, Pepys helped to discharge the navy. [8] The Dutch had defeated England on open water and now began to threaten English soil itself. In June 1667, they conducted their Raid on the Medway, broke the defensive chain at Gillingham, and towed away the Royal Charles, one of the Royal Navy's most important ships. As he had done during the Fire and the Plague, Pepys again removed his wife and his gold from London. [8] Pepys sets the scene by describing his personal and family circumstances and we understand that he is conscious of his health, an aspect of life which is very precarious in the 17 th century. Pepys ‘old pain’ refers to his bladder and kidney stones, a very large bladder stone having been removed in 1658. So grateful was he to have survived the extremely dangerous and painful operation that he held a special dinner every year on its anniversary.

Retrace Samuel Pepys’ steps in the Great Fire of London Retrace Samuel Pepys’ steps in the Great Fire of London

By using the shorthand system, Pepys was able to put a great amount of information to paper in a short space of time, and speed was his primary reason for using the system in his diary (although the secrecy aspect may have been an advantage too – his wife Elizabeth would not have had knowledge of the shorthand). Nine years after he began, Samuel Pepys stopped writing because he thought he was losing his eyesight. The former Towie star has welcomed a baby boy with longtime partner Paul Knightley, giving their two eldest children, Paul Jr, six, and Rosie, four, an adorable little brother to fawn over. Many thanks to the following for their kind contributions of gifts in the past: Roger Arbor, Alan Bedford, Todd Bernhardt, James B Collins and his 'European Civilization to 1789' class, Diarist.com, Peter Easton, David Gurliacci, Louise Hayes, Gerry Healy, Laura K, Jeannine Kerwin, Mary Knight, William Loughner, Sari Magaziner, Peter Mehlin, David Nix, R Rawlins, Carole Sargent, Evelyn Senior, Sharon, John Grahame Simmons, Glyn Thomas, Keith Wright and others. In 1657, Pepys decided to undergo surgery; not an easy option, as the operation was known to be especially painful and hazardous. Nevertheless, Pepys consulted surgeon Thomas Hollier and, on 26 March 1658, the operation took place in a bedroom in the house of Pepys' cousin Jane Turner. [a] Pepys' stone was successfully removed [b] and he resolved to hold a celebration on every anniversary of the operation, which he did for several years. [c] However, there were long-term effects from the operation. The incision on his bladder broke open again late in his life. The procedure may have left him sterile, though there is no direct evidence for this, as he was childless before the operation. [d] In mid-1658 Pepys moved to Axe Yard, near the modern Downing Street. He worked as a teller in the Exchequer under George Downing. [8] Diary [ edit ] Spoken excerpt of Pepys' diary A facsimile of part of the first entry in the diary Samuel Pepys' bookplate. The motto reads Mens cujusque is est Quisque – "Mind Makes the Man". [16]Further question: What impressed me most was how the diaries are so clearly related, yet never in a way that compromises the plot's integrity. (For example:One diary discusses helping Brian with his poetry homework, the other then has a poetry puzzle.) It seems so obvious that the two diaries are in communication from a narrative standpoint, but it doesn't feel ham-handed, and the twist remains completely believable in retrospect.